115 research outputs found
The need to know: governing a region and its economy
This paper investigates the ways in which the economy has been incorporated into the political reasoning and practice of region-building in the Barents Region among experts. While economic regionalism has been a key strand of studies on historic regionalism, this is not the case for the Barents Region. Yet, the natural resources of the region continue to raise high expectations about cross-border economic cooperation and development. Full appreciation of any regional development is underpinned by research and knowledge combining both political and economic considerations, but this basis is somewhat less solid in the Barents area. The knowledge base about the region and its development is therefore fragmented, limited and partial. This is an obvious problem, as many of the recent developments in the Barents Region, and also in the larger Arctic context, relate to economic opportunities, cooperation and development with implications also for political cooperation and governance. The paper analyses the development of political Barents studies from early 1990s until today, in particular its relation with economic developments in the region.publishedVersio
Arktista utopiaa
Laurence C. Smith: Uusi pohjoinen. Maailma vuonna 2050.
Ursa 2011
ARKTINEN HETEROTOPIA NeljÀ tarinaa RovaniemeltÀ
publishedVersio
Neoliberal governance, sustainable development and local communities in the Barents Region
There are currently high hopes in the Barents Region for economic growth, higher
employment and improved well-being, encouraged by developments in the energy industry,
tourism and mining. The article discusses these prospects from the perspective
of local communities in five locations in the region, which spans the northernmost
counties of Finland, Norway, Sweden and Northwest Russia. The communities studied
are remote, relatively small, multicultural, and dependent on natural resources. The
salient dynamic illuminated in the research is how ideas of sustainability and neoliberal
governance meet in community development. While the two governmentalities often
conflict, they sometimes also complement one another, posing a paradox that raises
concerns over the social aspect of sustainable development in particular. The article
is based on international, multidisciplinary research drawing on interviews as well as statistical and documentary analysis
- âŠ